Interviews, Reviews, Analysis, and Comment

Wallace Shawn’s Essays

In Foreign Policy, Shawn, Wallace on January 28, 2010 at 7:33 pm

In his novel Timequake, Kurt Vonnegut wrote that art is important because,  “Many people need desperately to receive this message: ‘I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.’”

I think this is true, especially when the person who sends the message can write or paint or sing much better than the recipient, who then not only feels less lonely but also, benefitting from the creator’s more effective expression, knows herself better, too.

I bet there is a handy German noun for this notion and if there is such a word, it would have been a good runner-up title for Wallance Shawn’s collection Essays (Haymarket Books, 2009).

Shawn is best known as a playwright and actor (I have heard that one’s culture may be measured by how far into William Tell Overture one can listen before thinking of the Lone Ranger. An alternate method would measure how long it takes one to recognize Shawn as the Sicilian assassin Vizzini from The Princess Bride.) He possesses the compound gift George Orwell described as “a facility with words and a power of facing unpleasant facts,” and in Essays applies it to issues of class, war, and art.

Describing his political perspective, Shawn writes that his mother taught him that “being an American meant being a person who loved the United Nations and was a friend to poor children all over the world, like Eleanor Roosevelt…”

“I never became as nice as my mother. But by the time I was forty-five I understood a few things that she’d overlooked,” he continues, articulating the common experience of we who were raised by political liberals and took those liberal ideas more seriously than our folks might have intended. “I suppose I’m something like what my mother would have been if she’d gone down into her basement and stumbled on Eleanor Roosevelt murdering babies there.”

Howard Zinn 1922-2010

In Foreign Policy, History, Zinn, Howard on January 28, 2010 at 12:21 pm


GR: Since September 11th, you’ve been in great demand as a speaker. How does the mainstream media depiction of the anti-war-events you’ve attended and of the anti-war movement in general compare with your own observations?

Howard Zinn: The major media have paid very little attention to the anti war movement. There’s an occasional article here and there, but there’s a lot more anti-war activity than you would gather from reading the mainstream press.

I know there have been at least 150 gatherings at campuses around the country. I mean, that was of two weeks ago and by now, I am sure there are many more.

I, and others I know, who have been involved, have been ferociously busy, and in fact, not able to meet all the requests to come and speak to student groups and community groups. And when we do speak, the crowds are very large.

I have spoken to audiences ranging from 500 to 1000 people since September 11th. I’ve spoken at Johns Hopkins, I’ve spoken in Iowa, I’ve spoken in Greensboro, North Carolina, I’ve spoken at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. I’ve spoken to high school assemblies. In fact, I’m about to go up tomorrow to speak in Oregon, at Oregon State University and then at Santa Cruz.

There’ve been rallies here in Boston, with thousands of people. Ralph Nader spoke the other day to several thousand people gathered. The emails I get from all parts of the country indicate that there is a very large amount of activity.

Some very famous writers have written articles and essays against the bombing, but have not appeared in the mainstream press. Barbara Kingsolver’s novel, The Poisonwood Bible, was an Oprah Winfrey selection. But, when Barbara Kingsolver wrote something just recently against the bombing, she couldn’t get it in the mainstream press. It appeared in In These Times which is, you know, a very good weekly publication, but doesn’t have a large circulation.

“The Weaponized Gospel of Jesus Christ”: Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation on fascists in the US military

In Fascism, Foreign Policy, Middle East, Military Issues, Religion, US Constitution, Weinstein, Mikey on January 18, 2010 at 11:38 am

“How do you see the balance between the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause?” I asked.

There was a long pause. Civilians might reasonably plead ignorance, but not a general who has sworn on his life to defend these words: “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

“I have to write those things down,” Regni finally answered. “What did you say those constitutional things were again?”

Journalist Jeff Sharlet, speaking with US Air Force Academy Commander Lieutenant General John Regni, “Jesus killed Mohammed: The crusade for a Christian military”, Harper’s Magazine, May 2009

“For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.

“Thus pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. It is bad because life is permanent warfare. This, however, brings about an Armageddon complex. Since enemies have to be defeated, there must be a final battle, after which the movement will have control of the world…

“In every mythology the hero is an exceptional being, but in Ur-Fascist ideology heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death. …the Ur-Fascist hero craves heroic death, advertised as the best reward for a heroic life. The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.”

From “Eternal Fascism: Fourteen Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt” by Umberto Eco, New York Review of Books, June 22, 1995

In the mainstream news media, there is much talk about the terrifying possibility of religious fundamentalists acquiring a weapon of mass destruction. Largely unreported is the fact that this has already occurred, not by the Taliban or al-Qaeda, but by Fundamentalist Christians in the US military, with control and access to incomprehensibly deadly weapons and a devotion to a homicidal and fascistic “End Times” theology